Anti-Spam Quality Standard: 15 to 25 verified applications per month. Zero fabricated claims. Read the research →
Career Crucible
B2B2C Institutional Platform

Outplacement & Cohort Placement Infrastructure

Equip departing employees, university graduates, and bootcamp cohorts with outcome-driven career infrastructure, backed by auditable placement reporting.

Auditable Placement Reporting

Replace subjective check-ins with quantitative survival analytics. Measure interview velocity, response latencies, and verified placement milestones across your entire cohort.

Zero Embellishment Risk

Protect your institution's reputation. Our Bid Crucible anti-fabrication layer ensures alumni and former employees never send hallucinated skills or exaggerated claims into the market.

Permanent Alumni Records

Every candidate graduates with a permanent Sealed Application Record and warm Career Graph, giving them an enduring asset that supports their long-term career resilience.

Institutional Pricing Structure

£250 to £450 per candidate seat

Competitive against legacy outplacement entry fees (Randstad RiseSmart $499/3mo, VelvetJobs $500, mid-tier $2,000+). Includes full Core platform features, diagnostic onboarding, and aggregate cohort reporting.

Schedule Institutional Briefing →

Frequently Answered Questions

Direct facts on how the technology operates, compliance with UK employment laws, and our rejection of AI application spam.

Why do outplacement providers and universities partner with Career Crucible? ↓
Traditional outplacement platforms focus on generic video courses and basic CV reviews with minimal outcome tracking. Career Crucible equips candidates with an outcome-driven AI agent that actively researches and prepares verifiable applications. Crucially, our outcome loop generates verifiable placement metrics and survival analytics that institutional sponsors need for reporting.
How does the payer model work? ↓
The institution purchases candidate seat licenses at £250 to £450 per seat. This completely resolves the consumer churn problem: the institutional payer does not churn when the candidate succeeds. The candidate receives full Core access, and the sponsor receives aggregate placement analytics.
How does cohort reporting comply with UK ASA/CAP rules? ↓
We practice denominator-honest cohort reporting. We never report self-selected numbers like '50% more interviews for active users'. Every candidate enrolled in the cohort is accounted for in the denominator, providing defensible, methodologically rigorous placement reports.
Is candidate personal data protected from sponsor overreach? ↓
Yes. In compliance with UK GDPR and data protection standards, institutional sponsors receive aggregate cohort analytics (application velocity, response times, placement rates by sector). Individual candidate career graphs, interview notes, and specific application materials remain strictly private to the candidate.